McGavic & Finney PC, an Oregon debt collection law firm that had several complaints over its debt-collection tactics has been closed down under an agreement with Justice Department.  Additionally, the settlement requires founding partner Derrick E. McGavic to pay $70,000 and surrender his license to practice law.

According to the Attorney General’s office, McGavic & Finney specialized in representing national debt collectors that purchase defaulted consumer obligations in massive quantities on the secondary market, often for pennies on the dollar.

Consumer complaints filed with the Oregon Department of Justice accused McGavic of ignoring debtor protections and rights afforded under the Federal Debt Collection Protection Acts

McGavic was accused of purposefully misidentifying the identity of creditors in documents to delay consumers’ response and thus increasing their fees and interest.

Notices issued by McGavic allegedly failed to provide proper verification of debts when requested by consumers. Similarly, McGavic allegedly repeatedly called debtors who had requested in writing not to be called.

The agreement filed Wednesday in Lane County Circuit Court requires Derrick McGavic to pay $70,000 to the Oregon Department of Justice to reimburse the cost of the investigation; dissolve the law firm of McGavic & Finney, PC; and resign from the Oregon State Bar.

McGavic is further prohibited from acting as a debt collector or operating a law firm or a collection agency in the state of Oregon.

If you are being harassed by debt collectors in violation of the FDCPA, you may be entitled to compensation.  Please call California Consumer Protection Attorney, Todd M. Friedman at 877-449-8898 for a free consultation.


In:

This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer

More Insights from the TMF Blog

a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.
a black and gold shield with a black shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold shield with a black and gold shield and a black and gold

The Hidden Costs of Surveillance Pricing: What Airlines Don’t Want You to Know

Airlines employ "surveillance pricing," using complex algorithms and extensive data tracking to determine personalized prices for flights. Factors such as browsing history, location, and time of search can covertly influence prices, posing concerns about privacy, fairness, deceptive practices, and legal protections for consumers.
a man standing behind a table with a scale in front of him

Is Delta’s AI Pricing Legal? A Consumer Rights Attorney’s Analysis

As a leading consumer protection law firm with offices across California, Ohio, Illinois and Pennsylvania, the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. is ...