A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

A/C repairman sues homeowner for personal injuries after staircase collapse

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Froilan Oritz, Jr., an air conditioning repairman has filed a personal injury lawsuit against homeowner, Elton L. Hudson after his stairs collapsed causing Ortiz to fall and hurt himself. (Case No. 13-CV-508)

According to the lawsuit, Oritz was in Hudson’s home to repair his air conditioner on April 4th.    As he walked up the stairs to the attic, where the a/c unit was located, the staircase gave way and caused him to fall.

Ortiz claims the fall left him with an interior capsule sprain of the ankle, a fractured talus, an osteochondritis dissecans of the post facet talus and talus at the ankle joint.

Hudson is accused of failing to warn of a known danger or hazardous condition or to make it reasonably safe; breaching his duty to inspect and make safe a dangerous condition; failing to reasonably and adequately maintain the stairs; and breaching his duty of ordinary care to make the stairs reasonably safe.

“The defendant knew or should have known that the condition of the attic stairs posed an unreasonable risk of harm to the plaintiff,” the suit says.

To be legally responsible for the injuries a person has suffered from falling on someone else’s property, the courts will consider the following:


  • Did the owner of the property cause the dangerous surface or item to be underfoot?

  • Did the owner of the property know of the dangerous surface but neglect to fix it?

  • The owner of the property should have known of the dangerous surface because a “reasonable” person taking care of the property would have discovered and repaired it.


Liability in these cases is often decided by common sense. The court system determines whether the owner of the property was careful by deciding if the steps the property owner took to keep the property safe were reasonable.

In determining a property owner’s “reasonableness,” the courts concentrate on whether the property owner makes regular and thorough efforts to keep the property safe and clean.

If you have suffered a personal injury due to the negligence of another person, please call California Personal Injury Attorney, Todd M. Friedman for a free consultation at 877-449-8898

 

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.