A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Bankruptcy and Student Loans

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

In order to discharge a student loan through bankruptcy, you must show that paying your student loan would impose an “undue hardship” to you.  What is considered to be an undue hardship is decided upon by a bankruptcy judge.

The factors taken into consideration for this decision are: whether you have made a good faith effort in paying off the debt (including looking for a job and minimizing living expenses), looking closely at your budget, and looking at your prospects for paying back the student loan. Although over 300,000 people default on student loans each year, it’s estimated that less than 1,000 manage to get their loans discharged in bankruptcy.

Recently, several legal cases have been making the news in which a parent co-signed on a student loan, and the student passed away, leaving the parent with the debt. It’s especially hard to get rid of private loans, or those loans that aren’t federally subsidized. Often in that situation, the parent or other co-signer will file bankruptcy, hoping that a judge finds that the student loan is an undue hardship for the debtor.

If you are behind in your student loans and running out of options, please give my office, The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman a call today at (877) 449-8898.

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.