A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Debt collection agency shut down after being caught setting up fake court proceedings

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

According to the Pennsylvania Attorney General, debt collection company, Unicredit, used fake court proceedings to deceive, mislead or frighten consumers into making payments or surrendering valuables without following the lawful procedures for debt collection.

The Attorney General’s Office accused Unicredit of sending letters to consumers that were often hand-delivered by people dressed like sheriff deputies, implying that consumers would be arrested if they failed to appear at their fake court, illegally staged by Unicredit.  These illegal subpoenas summoned consumers to an office,  which included a room referred by Unicredit employees as “the courtroom.”

The “court room” was located in the Unicredit “Debt Resolution Center.” This Unicredit office was equipped with furniture and decorations similar to those used in actual court offices, including “a raised bench area where a fake judge would be seated; two tables and chairs in front of the bench for attorneys and defendants; a simulated witness stand; seating for spectators; and legal books on bookshelves.”  During some fake proceedings, an individual dressed in black was seated on the bench presenting himself as a judge. These fake court proceedings were used to intimidate consumers into providing their bank account information and giving up their assets.

The Attorney General’s Bureau of Consumer Protection filed a lawsuit against Unicredit America, Inc., and a petition for special and preliminary injunction, asking the court to prohibit the company from engaging in any debt collection and immediately stop all fake hearings or depositions.

At the 1st hearing, Unicredit agreed to put an end the tactics at the center of the government’s complaint and to stop sending letters threatening consumers with arrest.  At the 2nd hearing the judge ordered the entire Unicredit operation closed.

Unicredit’s actions were in direct violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), which prohibits  debt collectors from using deception to force payment, pretending to be a lawyer or police officer, claiming to have initiated a lawsuit, or using stationary designed to look like official court or government communication.

If you are being harassed by debt collectors, in violation of the FDCPA please call, Consumer Protection Attorney, Todd M. Friedman at 877-449-8898 for a free consultation.

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.