A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Debt Collectors and Social Media…

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

The  Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, (FDCPA)  does not specifically prohibit debt collectors from using Facebook, Twitter or LinkedIn to locate  and contact you about your debt.

Under the FDCPA, you are entitled to privacy about your debts. For example, debt collectors aren’t allowed to publish your name, contact you by postcard, or call your friends and family members to tell them about your debts (although they can call to obtain contact information for you).

Therefore, because the FDCPA is intended to prevent collectors from letting other people know about your debts, debt collectors are not permitted to post information regarding your debt on your Facebook wall, LinkedIn page or your Twitter page, as this would be violating the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

Creditors also sometimes use information on social networks to contact debtors. If you haven’t kept your address or phone number up to date with the creditor, it is likely that you are still checking your Facebook page or other social media and creditors may use those to contact you. In addition, in some cases creditors will create fake profiles on social media sites in the hopes that you will respond to them or that they can find out your current location.

Some experts recommend that in order to prevent communication on social media sites from creditors, you take full advantage of the site’s privacy settings. You can choose to block your private information from the public. You should be picky about what you choose to make public, such as your email address, phone number, or address. Also, don’t accept friend requests from unknown individuals, as debt collectors are not the only people looking to find out your personal information for unwanted reasons.

Have you been harassed by creditors on social media websites? You may be able to pursue a claim against the creditor under the FDCPA.  Contact The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman at (877) 449-8898 to find out more information.

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.