A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

False Advertising

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

California has laws imposing penalties on businesses that try to deceive consumers or other companies through unfair practices such as false claims regarding products or services. False advertising laws are designed to protect the consumers, such as yourself.

Below are descriptions of the these laws.


  • Any type of deceptive advertising that causes a loss of revenue for any competitor is prohibited

  • Businesses deceiving consumers by advertising a product, property, or service in a false or deceptive manner is also prohibited


While, it is common for advertisers and competitors in the same industry to all claim to be able to provide “the best” services or products, simply saying they are “the best” is not prohibited.  As statements like “best product” are considered to be a personal opinion,  not a fact, so there are stipulations to the law that do allow for this type of competitive advertising.

However, when an advertisement goes a step beyond being competitive and is designed to deceive consumers into purchasing a service or product that is not what is promised, then it  becomes a problem. In such instances, legal actions may be brought by an injured consumers and also, in some cases, by business competitors to recover lost revenue or payment.

An example of when advertising is considered deceptive rather than just competitive is the class action lawsuit presently being filed against Kia and Hyundai for false inflating mileage.  With the high cost of gas many consumers are making their car buying decisions based on mpg.  Not only does it hurt the consumer when they decide to buy a Hyundai over a competitor because they believe they will get better gas savings, but it also hurts the competitor that has posted it’s correct mpg which may show a less desirable mpg than the inflated mpg that Hyundai deceptively posted.

If you have been a victim of false advertising at the hands of Kia, Hyundai or another auto maker please give my office, The Law Office of Todd M. Friedman a call at (877) 449-8898.

 

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.