A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Protecting yourself against credit reporting errors

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

It has happened to many people and it has probably happened to you: You check your credit score and the number is lower than it should be, or perhaps it has suddenly taken a significant dip since your previous credit-score check and there’s no reason for it that you know of. Perhaps you have checked your credit report and you spot an obvious error or a credit incident that you don’t recognize.

But what can you do about it? If you spot errors in your credit report or suspect something is wrong, it is important to know your rights and what you can do to fight back and protect your financial interests.

A Recent Credit Reporting Error

ABC News recently reported an incident that is all too familiar. Jerry Rosen, a business owner, was denied a loan because of a sudden, unexpected dip of his previously stellar credit score.

Checking into the problem, Rosen discovered that a creditor – Hyundai Motor Finance – made an erroneous report regarding a late payment on a loan he had once held. Hyundai apparently offered to notify the credit bureaus about the mistake but the company would not give him anything in writing to salvage the loan he was seeking.

Know Your Rights

There are some important rights regarding credit reporting errors that you need to know if you are ever seeking a loan or other line of credit:

  • You have a right to proper and accurate credit reporting
  • Any company that has made an erroneous report is required to report the error to all three credit bureaus.
  • The credit bureaus must post the correction within 30 days of receiving the report of erroneous information.

If you have suffered damages as a result of an erroneous credit report or failure to correction in a timely manner, you could potentially obtain compensation for your losses. Do not wait. The sooner you talk with an attorney and bring a legal claim, the better your chances for obtaining the full and fair compensation to which you are entitled.

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.