A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Restaurant facing a retaliation lawsuit after a threatening online rants

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

According to the retaliation lawsuit, two bartenders were already engaged in a wage-and-hour lawsuit against Coyote Ugly alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) when the president and founder of Coyote Ugly posted an entry on her blog, mentioning the lawsuit and alleging that one of the employees  was fired for theft and added “f*** that b****.”

Additionally, a supervisor took it a step further and made a post to his Facebook page stating “Dear God, please don’t let me kill the girl that is suing me . . . . that is all . . . .” while allegedly sitting across the bar from the other employee.

Later that same night, the supervisor was told a customer had fallen and threatened to sue the company. The supervisor stated, “Why does everyone sue? I’m tired of all of these b****** taking their issues out on our company. They are f***ing idiots.”

Although the supervisor was facing another individual, his body was allegedly turned towards the employee, who was less than three feet away, while he made this statement.

The court found that the Facebook post, blog post and supervisor outburst could support the employees’ claims for retaliation for engaging in protected activity under the FLSA.

The original wage-and-hour  FLSA collective lawsuit was based on an allegedly illegal tip pool.   Bartenders were required to put all of the tips they earned during a shift into a pool.  The pool was then distributed among Coyote Ugly’s bartenders, barbacks, and security guards who worked that shift.

Tip pooling is a common practice, but when it is done improperly, it can be a major source of problems.  In this case, the employees claimed that the tip pool was unlawful because security guards, are not  typically “tipped employees,” participated in it.  The FLSA defines “tipped employees,” as those who “customarily and regularly receive tips,” such as waitresses and bartenders.

If your employer is violating California Labor Law and owes you money, please give Los Angeles Employment Attorney, Todd M. Friedman, P.C.. Friedman for a free consultation.

Quick Navigation

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.