A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Dairy Queen Franchisee Sued For Sexual Harassment and Wrongful Termination

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Dairy Queen Franchise operator, YS&J Enterprises, Inc.,  will pay $17,500 and furnish significant remedial relief to settle a sexual harassment and retaliation lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). (EEOC v. YS&J Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Dairy Queen, Civil Action No. 1:11 CV 01103),

According to the EEOC’s lawsuit,  18-year-old Chastity Hill-Cox was harassed by a male cashier.  The EEOC contends that male cashier spoke explicitly about his sexual encounters, and made several sexual gestures in which he simulated sex acts. The lawsuit further alleges that the cashier called Hill-Cox offensive gender-based epithets  on a frequent basis.

Hill-Cox complained about the harassment to the restaurant manager, but management failed to stop the harassment.  According to the lawsuit, Hill-Cox’s mother called the Winston-Salem police to report the harassment. The suit further claims that while the police were present at the restaurant responding to Hill-Cox’s complaint, the manager fired Hill-Cox, stating that Hill-Cox was “causing too many problems” for the restaurant.

“Sexual harassment in the workplace is unacceptable,” said Lynette A. Barnes, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Charlotte District. “Further, employers are liable when they fail to address harassment once they have knowledge that such behavior is occurring, and cannot fire employees who complain. We are pleased with this resolution.”

EEOC Supervisory Trial Attorney Tina Burnside added, “Employers have a clear legal duty under federal law to respond to discrimination complaints and ensure that the unlawful conduct stops.

If you have been the victim of harassment or wrongful termination, please give my office, The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman a call at (877) 449-8898.

 

 

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Verdict

November 2007 jury verdict against Honda for breach of warranty in Orange County Superior Court.

More Details
Undisclosed
Verdict

Lemon Law jury trial verdict against Honda in 2006. Plaintiff prevailed on claims that vehicle failed to conform to warranty after reasonable repair attempts.

More Details
Undisclosed
Verdict

August 4, 2005 jury verdict for breach of warranty under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. Firm also successfully defended the appeal in this case.

More Details
Undisclosed
Verdict

Trial victory against Mercedes-Benz USA for Lemon Law violations and breach of express and implied warranties under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. Firm also successfully defended Mercedes’ subsequent appeal (B192382).

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against HSBC Bank. Final approval granted.

More Details
$400,000–$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

CLRA class action certified on behalf of tens of thousands of consumers harmed by HP printer firmware update practices. Final approval granted 2016.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

Co-lead class counsel in consolidated Unfair Competition Law class action alleging HP covertly pushed a firmware update that prevented consumers’ printers from accepting third-party ink cartridges. Final approval granted.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

FCRA class action for improper credit pulls (unauthorized hard inquiries). Certified under Rule 23 by contested motion and settled on a class-wide basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
Undisclosed
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

PAGA settlement in wage and hour action on behalf of employees. Settlement approval granted.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.