On August 3, 2017, A California federal judge on Monday gave final approval to a $457,000 settlement resolving claims brought pursuant to the Electronic Funds Transfer Act against a California Based Bail Bonds Company that consumers said illegally debited money from their bank accounts without written authorization.
Published: August 4, 2017
Updated: March 28, 2025
This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer.
Categories
- blog
- Business & Commercial Law
- Class Action
- Consumer Fraud
- Consumer Rights
- Credit Card Debt
- Credit Errors
- Creditor Harassment
- Elder Abuse
- Employee Rights
- Employment Contracts
- Employment Law
- Firm News
- Lemon Law
- Personal Injury
- Products Liability
- Uncategorized
- Workers Rights
Ready to Fight Back?
More Insights from the TMF Blog
Credit Reporting Errors: How to Fix Your Credit Report and Sue for Damages
Table of Contents Key Takeaways Credit report errors affect millions of Americans, leading to denied loans, higher interest rates, and employment rejections. Understanding your ...
Unfair Business Practices: California’s UCL and Consumer Protection Remedies
Table of Contents Key Takeaways Four-year statute of limitations applies to most UCL claimsCalifornia’s Unfair Competition Law provides consumers with powerful tools to combat ...
Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action
Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.
