A Consumer Protection and Employment Law Firm Serving California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Illinois.

Sexual Harassment FAQ

Table Of Contents
Summarize with
ChatGPT Claude Gemini Perplexity Grok

Protecting Harassed Employees Throughout California

According to a report released by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), California workers filed nearly 7,000 sex-related charges between Jan. 2009 and Dec. 2014. In fact, of the employment-related charges filed annually, an average of 27 percent are the result of sexual harassment or other sex-related violations or crimes. These numbers clearly show the prevalence of sexual harassment in California workplaces. Unfortunately, these numbers only represent the employees who filed charges — not the ones who suffered in silence.

If you have suffered in silence because you are unsure whether you are a victim of sexual harassment, you do not have to suffer any longer. The attorneys at the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C., will protect your right to a safe, harassment-free workplace while representing your interests in court.

What Does Sexual Harassment Look Like In The Eyes Of The Law?

If you have had to endure any of the following, you may be a victim of sexual harassment:

  • Inappropriate sexual advances
  • Promotion offers or other employment-related offers hinged on sexual favors
  • Threats, demotions or terminations after declining sexual advances
  • Inappropriate verbal or visual conduct
  • Inappropriate propositions or comments
  • Unwanted and inappropriate physical contact

What Are My Rights?

No one should have to put up with sexual harassment in the workplace. Thankfully, the law concurs. By law, employers must take appropriate action to not only prevent sexual harassment, but also to take complaints seriously and investigate thoroughly when notified of an alleged incident.

If your employer has done nothing with your complaint or dragged its feet on your claim, a lawyer can assist you in asserting your rights by filing a claim with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH). The department will conduct its own independent investigation and take further legal action if it finds the employer failed in its duty to act or prevent sexual harassment.

Is There A Time Limit For Filing A Claim?

Generally speaking, you have one year from when the incident or incidents occurred to file a claim with the DFEH.

Get The Answers You Need Today: Nationwide Services

At the Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C., we will take the time to listen to your story carefully and determine your options for taking legal action against the person or entity that violated your rights. Schedule a free initial consultation at our office in Calabasas via email or by calling toll free.

Free Consultation

Undisclosed
Settlement

TCPA class action against the Los Angeles Times. Final approval granted 2014.

More Details
$750,000
Settlement

Common fund class-wide TCPA settlement against home healthcare provider. Final approval granted.

More Details
$27.6M
Settlement

TCPA class action certified on behalf of approximately 2,000,000 class members under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3). Subsequently settled on a Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) basis. Final approval granted.

More Details
$5.2M
Settlement

/

Unruh Act class action on behalf of approximately 240,000 consumers challenging Tinder’s age-based differential pricing for its subscription service. Final approval granted; subsequently went up on appeal.

More Details
$390,000
Settlement

TCPA class action alleging HD Supply sent unauthorized marketing text messages to consumers’ mobile phones without consent between October 21, 2011 and July 26, 2017. Presided over by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case terminated January 29, 2018.

More Details
$1,500,000
Settlement

/

TCPA class action against a Kansas-based payday lender alleged to have contacted consumers via prerecorded calls on their cell phones to collect alleged debts without consent. California federal judge granted final approval.

More Details
$6,500,000
Settlement

/

Cal. Penal Code § 632.7 class action certified by contested motion under Rule 23(b)(2) and (b)(3) on behalf of over 40,000 class members whose calls were recorded without their knowledge or consent. Final approval granted.

More Details
$13,000,000
Settlement

/

$13 Million Class action alleging HSBC recorded consumer telephone calls without knowledge or consent in violation of California’s Privacy Statute (Penal Code § 632.7). California Federal Judge granted final approval.

More Details
$34,000,000
Settlement

/

One of the largest TCPA class action settlements in U.S. history at time of approval. Alleged Chase used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact consumers on their cell phones without prior express consent from July 2008 through December 2013. Settlement class included over 32 million members. Final approval granted March 2016.

More Details
$150,000,000
Settlement

/

Class action on behalf of over 100,000 owners of GM vehicles equipped with allegedly defective LG-manufactured batteries posing fire and safety risks. Litigation commenced December 2020. U.S. District Judge Terrence G. Berg indicated preliminary approval of the $150 million settlement.

More Details
$100,000,000
Settlement

/ /

Landmark gig-economy class action. DoorDash drivers in California and Massachusetts alleged they were wrongly classified as independent contractors rather than employees. Firm served as class counsel. Final approval granted January 13, 2022 — the largest gig-economy worker class settlement in U.S. history at the time.

More Details

Office Locations

Copyright 2025 Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. All Rights Reserved.